Sorry, no records were found. Please adjust your search criteria and try again.
Sorry, unable to load the Maps API.
Steward Sally S, an attorney based in Danville, Indiana, has received overwhelmingly negative feedback from clients regarding her performance as a guardian ad litem. Reviewers express frustration with her lack of communication, perceived bias, and negligence in handling sensitive custody cases, often feeling that she prioritizes financial gain over the well-being of children and families. Many clients indicate that their experiences with her have been deeply disappointing, leading them to seek further action against her professional conduct.
Truly the worst experience I’ve ever had. I temporarily lost custody of my oldest due to 100% HER negligence. My records show that I’ve called and emailed Sally 58 times. She’s answered 3 times. She’s VERY biased. Cannot help you in emergencies. Thankfully I have custody returned. Sally is not reliable at most. She’s a judges daughter and just skirts by. BE EXTREMELY WARY.
If I could leave a negative star review, I’d leave it a thousand times over. Sally was appointed as a guardian at litem, at my request for a GAL, due to the crystal clear parental alienation that was taking place in my custody case. Due to confidentiality, I will not get into the specifics of the case, but her performance in this case warrants a complaint with the Indiana Judicial Branch, which will be my next step, and hopefully an investigation into her performance as a GAL. Her lack of expertise in this field was overwhelming. She was so cocky, and arrogant, with nothing to back it up. The job of a Guardian at Litem is to be the voice of the children, and yet she didn’t even speak to the kids a couple of weeks before her report was due to the court. TWO WEEKS. Four months after she was appointed to our case. Every email I sent her, she never responded to. It wasn’t until my daughter, who I had been alienated from was having a medical surgery, and I was given one week notice, that she actually responded back to my email. Only to scold me in her response back because by reaching out her with my concern for this surgery, that apparently isn’t how things are done in a custody hearing??? And apparently it was my responsibility to email her again if she never responded back to my email…My daughter who I’ve been alienated from is having a difficult time with life right now and Sally had a DUTY, a RESPONSIBILITY to make sure she was doing her due diligence, and to see through the lies, but she did none of that. She made a judgement in her initial meetings with me and my husband and my ex and his wife, and once she picked a side, she did no further work to gain anymore information. I don’t know how this woman sleeps at night knowing how negligent she is in her job, and how that impacts CHILDREN and FAMILIES every single day.
Worst experience I have ever had. Doesn’t vet out any information. Just another way to bilk folks out of money when there are sensitive issues at hand. Office staff (Beth) is EXTREMELY RUDE AND HAS NO BUSINESS WORKING WITH THE PUBLIC. What a sham.
