Shehu Law Firm does not just represent injured victims involved in a car accident, we make things right. Call us to get everything you’re entitled to, we are ready to fight for you.
Sorry, no records were found. Please adjust your search criteria and try again.
Sorry, unable to load the Maps API.
Shehu Law Firm does not just represent injured victims involved in a car accident, we make things right. Call us to get everything you’re entitled to, we are ready to fight for you.
Shehu Law Firm, located in Wethersfield, Connecticut, is highly regarded as a dedicated and professional attorney and law firm specializing in personal injury cases. Clients consistently express their satisfaction with the firm’s attentive communication and commitment to achieving favorable outcomes, citing the expertise of Attorney Shehu and his paralegal, Anna. Many reviewers highlight their positive experiences, recommending Shehu Law Firm for its exceptional service, thoroughness, and ability to secure desired results.
I had an excellent experience working with Ben and Anna . From our very first meeting, they were very professional, attentive, and genuinely committed to my case. They took the time to explain every step of the legal process and kept me informed all the time. Their expertise and attention to detail gave me a great deal of confidence, and it truly showed in the results.I couldn’t be more satisfied with the results.I highly recommend Attorney Shehu to anyone looking for a knowledgeable and dedicated attorney.Thank you for the support and excellent work.
At first I had doubts because I never heard of him or the firm but I must say Mr she h u is a bright and confident young man who believes in his abilities to conquer any tasks put in front of him and he made me a Believer too thanks greatly appreciated keep up the good work
In August 2024, we retained Shehu’s legal services to initiate eviction proceedings. We informed him of a significant tenant disturbance culminating in a physical altercation, providing assurance that the incident was fully documented on video. His counsel, however, was to await rent default for a stronger legal position. Following his recommendation, we commenced eviction proceedings in mid-August, but court scheduling delays, due to tenant-requested continuances, postponed the hearing until November. Throughout this period, Shehu demonstrated a lack of engagement, declining to review the video evidence or discuss case strategy, instead directing us to monitor the ct.gov portal for updates. This lack of proactive communication indicated a significant deficiency in legal representation. Even on the day of the hearing, despite prior assurances that our presence was unnecessary, we attended court, only to observe Shehu’s complete disregard for our presence. In conclusion, his primary recommendation was to grant the tenants a 30-day extension and withdraw the motion contingent upon their full compliance with the eviction notice. However, the tenants failed to comply, retaining keys and continuing to occupy the premises past the agreed-upon date. This was communicated to Shehu, who simply advised changing the locks, and subsequently granted the motion withdrawal without prior consultation or confirmation. The entire process felt biased in favor of the tenant, rendering his services unsatisfactory and unsuitable for future eviction proceedings. I will be requesting a second opinion on this case and its handling.
